From: A fresh look at tobacco harm reduction: the case for the electronic cigarette
Positive | Negative |
---|---|
Beneficial effects on health (improved exercise tolerance, and less cough) | Small percent of the population is sensitive to propylene glycol (dry mouth and throat) |
No tobacco smoke odor or bad breath | Some flavors (e.g. piña colada) have a lingering smell |
Much less toxic than conventional cigarettes | Trace amounts of contaminants and metals present in some products |
Mimics the “throat hit” sensation of inhaling smoke | “Throat hit” sensation dependent on hardware used and liquid composition |
Replicates gestures or actions associated with smoking behavior | Equipment is heavier than traditional cigarette and puffing technique requires some training |
Facilitates smoking abstinence | Not all users manage to quit smoking or reduce consumption of conventional cigarettes |
Relieves withdrawal symptoms and craving for conventional cigarettes | Relief of withdrawal symptoms varies, affected by quality of equipment and nicotine strength of liquid |
No risk to bystanders. | Due to few studies on potential risk to bystanders, some communities are outlawing indoor use |
No ash, dirt, or burned clothes | Environmental concern about safe disposal of cartridges and batteries |
Accessible prices (in the long run cheaper than conventional cigarettes) | The intricacies of their use and maintenance may hinder widespread adoption |
Much improved self-regulatory framework by e-cigarettes industry | Impending medicinal regulation in many countries |