Skip to main content

Table 4 Bivariate analysis of factors associated with LDS syringe use in the last month among surveyed IDUs in the North (n = 680)

From: Social marketing of low dead space syringes in Vietnam: findings from a 1-year pilot program in Hanoi, Thai Nguyen, and Ho Chi Minh City

Characteristics

Total n (%)

Used LDSS in the last month n (%)

Odds ratio (95 % CI)

r

p value

Age

680

143

1.148 (0.357–3.767)

0.046

0.254

Education level

 Never been at school/primary school (ref)

32

3 (2.1 %)

0.204 (0.019–2.216)

  

 Secondary school

311

60 (41.9 %)

0.737 (0.398–1.365)

0.217

0.192

 High school or above

337

73 (51.0 %)

 

0.314

0.332

Income

680

143

0.905 (0.757–1.082)

0.097

0.273

Injection frequency in the past week

680

143

1.731 (1.101–2.665)

0.538

0.017

Ever been stopped by police relating drug use

 Yes

251

58 (40.5 %)

1.655 (1.116–2.452)

0.750

0.006

 No

429

85 (59.5 %)

   

Sharing N/S in the last 12 months

 Yes

35

8 (5.6 %)

1.869 (.663–5.271)

0.049

0.230

 No

645

135 (94.4 %)

   

Self-reported HIV status

 Positive

81

6 (4.2 %)

1.397 (0.542–3.297)

0.031

0.444

 Negative or unknown

599

137 (95.8 %)

   

Believed that LDSS is easily hidden from police and other non-drug users

 Yes

186

56 (24.4 %)

1.718 (1.290–2.015)

0.654

0.027

 No

422

87 (61.6 %)

   

Aware that LDSS is easily accessed at late night

 Yes

146

39 (27.3 %)

2.733 (1.052–3.219)

0.317

0.016

 No

534

104 (72.7 %)

   

LDSS is encouraged to use by injecting mates

 Yes

136

63 (44.0 %)

2.341 (1.374–2.816)

0.421

0.013

 No

544

80 (56.0 %)

   

LDSS is affordable

 Yes

98

16 (11.2 %)

1.732 (1.034–2.310)

0.360

0.027

 No

582

127 (88.8 %)

   

Awareness of LDSS non-health benefits

 Yes

238

95 (66.4 %)

4.231 (2.734–4.710)

0.713

0.001

 No

442

48 (33.6 %)

   

Aware that LDSS can minimize the risk of HIV and HCV infection

 Yes

176

54 (37.7 %)

1.446 (1.263–1.655)

0.523

0.012

 No

514

89 (62.3 %)

   

Exposure to LDSS social marketing activities

 Yes

145

111 (77.6 %)

23.08 (13.26–40.16)

0.789

0.001

 No

535

32 (22.3 %)

   
  1. CI confidence interval, r Pearson’s correlation coefficient