From: Co-design of harm reduction materials for people who inject drugs to implement research findings
Learning outcome topic | Description | Recommendation |
---|---|---|
Stakeholder consultation is key | The consultation process with NSP ensured the informational materials are useable/relevant in different NSP contexts. | Identify and be responsive to the needs and requirements of a broad range of stakeholders. |
Importance of emphasising peers’ preferences | The facilitators emphasised that the peers were the experts in the co-design process. | Clarify roles and form equitable partnerships at the beginning of the project. |
Need to recognise threats to co-production | The facilitators found it difficult at times not to intervene or unintentionally influence the views of the co-designers. | Engage in reflective practices to recognise and overcome threats to equitable co-production. |
Necessary to give peers’ a voice | The facilitators advocated for peer viewpoints during meetings they did not attend. | Voice peer viewpoints when they are not present. |
Flexibility and reflection | This project highlights the importance of being flexible and responsive to new insights and ideas. | Co-designed projects require flexibility in their approach to ensure the product produced meets the end users’ needs. |