MAP participants | N = 19 (%) | Residential/shelter MAPs N = 16 (%) |
---|---|---|
Willingness to participate | ||
CSP, no model specified | ||
Yes | 16 (84.2%) | |
No | 2 (10.5%) | |
Don’t know | 1 (5.3%) | |
CSP, partial substitution | ||
Yes | 15 (78.9%) | |
No | 3 (16%) | |
Don’t know | 1 (5.3%) | |
CSP, complete substitution | ||
Yes | 12 (63.2%) | |
No | 5 (26.3%) | |
Don’t know | 2 (10.5%) | |
Willingness to participate in CSP-Sub-models | ||
Partial substitution, staff administration at fixed times | 15 (78.9%) | 15 (93.8%) |
Partial substitution, staff administration by participant choice | 13 (68.4%) | 13 (81.3%) |
Partial substitution, self-administration | 11 (57.9%) | 8 (50.0%) |
Complete substitution, staff administration at fixed times | 9 (47.4%) | 9 (56.3%) |
Complete substitution, self-administration | 6 (31.6%) | 4 (25.0%) |
NA | ||
Preference of CSP sub-models(1st ranked option) | ||
Partial substitution, staff administration at fixed times | 3 (15.8%) | 3 (18.8%) |
Partial substitution, staff administration by participant choice | 5 (26.3%) | 5 (31.3%) |
Partial substitution, self-administration | 6 (31.6%) | 3 (18.8%) |
Complete substitution, staff administration at fixed times | 0 | 0 |
Complete substitution, self-administration | 4 (21.1%) | 4 (25.0%) |
NA | 1 (5.3%) | 1 (6.3%) |
MAP staff | N = 17 (%) | N = 14 (%) |
---|---|---|
Feasibility of CSP sub-models (1st ranked option) | ||
Partial substitution, staff administration at fixed times | 5 (29.4%) | 5 (35.7%) |
Partial substitution, staff administration by participant choice | 7 (41.2%) | 7 (50.0%) |
Partial substitution, self-administration | 3 (17.6%) | 0 |
Complete substitution, staff administration at fixed times | 0 | 0 |
Complete substitution, self-administration | 0 | 0 |