Table 2 Sample characteristics
From: Gambling treatment service providers’ views about contingency management: a thematic analysis
Characteristic | N | % |
|---|---|---|
Region | ||
London | 4 | 13.3 |
Midlands | 6 | 20.0 |
SE England | 8 | 26.7 |
SW England | 1 | 3.3 |
Scotland | 2 | 6.7 |
Wales | 4 | 13.3 |
Yorkshire/Humber | 5 | 16.7 |
Service type | ||
Addiction Services (alcohol, drugs, gambling) | 2 | 6.7 |
Citizens Advice Bureau | 4 | 13.3 |
GamCare | 5 | 16.7 |
GamCare partner | 11 | 36.7 |
NHS | 4 | 13.3 |
Residential | 2 | 6.7 |
Other | 2 | 6.7 |
Role | ||
Frontline advisor | 6 | 20.0 |
Practitioner, counsellor or therapist | 16 | 53.3 |
Manager or senior clinician | 8 | 26.7 |
Age group | ||
18–24 | 0 | 0.0 |
25–34 | 1 | 3.3 |
35–44 | 11 | 36.7 |
45–54 | 8 | 26.7 |
55–64 | 9 | 30.0 |
65–74 | 3 | 10.0 |
Sex | ||
Female | 20 | 66.7 |
Male | 10 | 33.3 |
Ethnicity | ||
Asian or Asian British | 2 | 6.7 |
White British | 21 | 70.0 |
Other White (including regions of British Isles) | 6 | 20.0 |
Other non-white | 1 | 3.3 |
Education (for example*) | ||
Level 2 (GCSE grade A*–C) | 2 | 6.7 |
Level 3 (AS/A level) | 2 | 6.7 |
Level 4 (cert of HE/ BTEC) | 0 | 0.0 |
Level 5 (diploma) | 7 | 23.3 |
Level 6 (bachelor’s degree) | 10 | 33.3 |
Level 7 (master’s degree) | 6 | 20.0 |
Level 8 (doctorate) | 3 | 10.0 |
Lived experience | ||
Yes | 5 | 16.7 |
No | 25 | 83.3 |
Years working in gambling field | ||
2 or fewer | 15 | 50.0 |
> 2–7 years | 8 | 26.7 |
> 7–12 years | 4 | 13.3 |
> 12 years | 3 | 10.0 |
Experience of incentives | ||
No | 23 | 76.7 |
Yes | 7 | 23.3 |