Variables
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
---|
1
|
1
| | | | | | | | |
2
|
.910**
|
1
| | | | | | | |
3
|
.697**
|
.752**
|
1
| | | | | | |
4
|
.547**
|
.556**
|
.596**
|
1
| | | | | |
5
|
.484**
|
.480**
|
.544**
|
.725**
|
1
| | | | |
6
|
−.122
|
−.086*
|
−.036
|
−.091
|
−.0788
|
1
| | | |
7
|
.080
|
−.119
|
−.071
|
−.078
|
−.026
|
.184*
|
1
| | |
8
|
−.203*
|
−.222*
|
−.154*
|
−.138
|
−.077
|
.307**
|
.582**
|
1
| |
9
|
−.047
|
−.070
|
−.043
|
−.120
|
−.112
|
.500**
|
− 0.050
|
.027
|
1
|
10
|
−.100
|
−.070
|
−.058
|
−.077
|
−.126
|
.261**
|
− .036
|
.068
|
.327**
|
11
|
−.106
|
− .098
|
−.085
|
−.112
|
−.175*
|
.175*
|
.241*
|
.333**
|
.146
|
12
|
− .178*
|
− .222*
|
−.216*
|
−.261**
|
−.216*
|
.163*
|
.145
|
.272**
|
.238*
|
13
|
.453**
|
.386**
|
.345**
|
.423**
|
.353**
|
−.068
|
− .065
|
− .238*
|
− .062
|
14
|
.349**
|
.299*
|
.243*
|
.281**
|
.164*
|
−.108
|
− .166*
|
− .226*
|
− .072
|
15
|
.297**
|
.237*
|
.180*
|
.259**
|
.193*
|
−.106
|
− .186*
|
− .212*
|
.020
|
16
|
.168*
|
.227*
|
.194*
|
.206*
|
.203*
|
−.099
|
− .160*
|
− .272**
|
− .085
|
17
|
.118
|
.134
|
.116
|
.237*
|
.284**
|
−.116
|
.047
|
.043
|
− .120
|
Variables
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
---|
1
| | | | | | | |
2
| | | | | | | |
3
| | | | | | | |
4
| | | | | | | |
5
| | | | | | | |
6
| | | | | | | |
7
| | | | | | | |
8
| | | | | | | |
9
| | | | | | | |
10
|
1
| | | | | | |
11
|
.255**
|
1
| | | | | |
12
|
.298**
|
.396**
|
1
| | | | |
13
|
− .054
|
− .183*
|
− .290**
|
1
| | | |
14
|
− .052
|
− .103
|
− .126
|
.252**
|
1
| | |
15
|
− .156*
|
− .130
|
− .007
|
.010
|
.542**
|
1
| |
16
|
− .243*
|
− .191*
|
− .554**
|
.018
|
.017
|
.067
|
1
|
17
|
− .059
|
.015
|
− .050
|
− .0643
|
.064
|
.086
|
.125
|
- *p ≤.05; **p ≤.001 Cronbach's alpha for all variables=0.81
- 1. My supervisor would approve of me referring a subject who appears to have an opioid addiction to MAT as an alternative to arrest
- 2. My coworkers would approve of me referring a subject who appears to have an opioid addiction to MAT as an alternative to arrest
- 3. My friends or neighbors would approve of me referring a subject who appears to have an opioid addiction to MAT as an alternative to arrest
- 4. Referring subjects who appears to have an opioid addiction to MAT helps reduce future arrests
- 5. Referring a subject who appears to have an opioid addiction to MAT increases his/her trust in the police, since they are getting the help they need
- 6. People who become addicted to opioids are to blame for their own condition
- 7. People who are addicted to opioids won’t hesitate to lie when it benefits their addiction
- 8. I would worry about a person in recovery for opioid addiction taking care of my family’s children for a few hours
- 9. When people become addicted to opioids, it’s because they lack the willpower to stop before it’s too late
- 10. Opioid/heroin users will use more Opioid/heroin if they know they have acesse to naloxone
- 11. Harm reduction services that distribute items such as syringes and naloxone condone a person’s addiction
- 12. There should be a limit on the number of times one person receives naloxone to reverse an overdose
- 13. How often do you provide information or make referrals to drug treatment or naloxone distribution programs?
- 14. When someone has illicit drugs, how often do you use your discretion not to arrest for drug possession?
- 15. When someone has a syringe, how often do you use your discretion not to arrest for syringe possession?
- 16. Everyone at risk of experiencing or witnessing an overdose should be given a supply of naloxone
- 17. People can successfully overcome an opioid addiction