Skip to main content

Table 3 Baseline experiences of drug use, MMT, and HIV stigma overall and by urbanicity (N = 279)

From: Cohort profile: the Kyrgyzstan InterSectional Stigma (KISS) injection drug use cohort study

Stigma type and mechanism

Internal reliability

Total N = 279

Bishkek N = 141

Chuy Oblast N = 138

t(df), p-value

 

No. items

α

ω

n

M, (SD)

M, (SD)

M, (SD)

 

Drug use stigma

Total

18

0.81

0.77

271

3.25 (0.57)

3.30 (0.54)

3.19 (0.59)

t(269) = 1.691, p = 0.046

Structural

3

0.61

0.61

278

3.30 (1.10)

3.33 (1.12)

3.27 (1.08)

t(276) = 0.440, p = 0.330

Anticipated

9

0.73

0.70

272

3.12 (0.63)

3.16 (0.64)

3.08 (0.62)

t(270) = 1.151, p = 0.125

 Family

3

0.83

0.83

273

3.18 (1.03)

3.18 (1.06)

3.17 (1.00)

t(271) = 0.065, p = 0.474

 Healthcare workers

3

0.69

0.69

278

3.24 (0.82)

3.33 (0.79)

3.15 (0.83)

t(276) = 1.758, p = 0.040

 Other PWID

3

0.67

0.67

279

2.93 (0.88)

2.96 (0.91)

2.91 (0.86)

t(277) = 0.487, p = 0.313

Internalized

6

0.88

0.88

279

3.39 (0.82)

3.48 (0.75)

3.30 (0.88)

t(277) = 1.900, p = 0.029

MMT stigma

Total

18

0.80

0.80

253

3.24 (0.54)

3.25 (0.55)

3.23 (0.53)

t(251) = 0.321, p = 0.374

Structural

3

0.63

0.67

262

3.04 (1.14)

3.01 (1.15)

3.06 (1.14)

t(260) = − 0.362, p = 0.359

Anticipated

9

0.78

0.78

264

3.35 (0.66)

3.38 (0.68)

3.33 (0.63)

t(262) = 0.574, p = 0.283

 Family

3

0.68

0.69

265

3.47 (0.86)

3.51 (0.92)

3.42 (0.79)

t(263) = 0.874, p = 0.191

 Healthcare workers

3

0.65

0.72

270

3.35 (0.80)

3.38 (0.80)

3.32 (0.81)

t(268) = 0.617, p = 0.269

 Other PWID

3

0.75

0.76

273

3.22 (0.92)

3.19 (0.95)

3.24 (0.90)

t(271) = − 0.457, p = 0.324

Stereotypes and prejudice

6

0.73

0.77

272

3.15 (0.64)

3.14 (0.65)

3.16 (0.64)

t(270) = − 0.220, p = 0.413

HIV stigma

Total

18

0.80

0.75

261

2.94 (0.54)

2.94 (0.55)

2.94 (0.52)

t(259) = − 0.043, p = 0.483

Structural

3

0.60

0.61

270

2.92 (1.12)

2.94 (1.10)

2.89 (1.14)

t(268) = 0.344, p = 0.365

Anticipated

9

0.81

0.78

272

3.11 (0.69)

3.10 (0.72)

3.12 (0.66)

t(270) = − 0.026, p = 0.490

 Family

3

0.89

0.89

273

2.81 (1.07)

2.85 (1.09)

2.77 (1.05)

t(271) = 0.640, p = 0.261

 Healthcare workers

3

0.79

0.80

278

3.08 (0.89)

3.07 (0.91)

3.10 (0.88)

t(276) = − 0.336, p = 0.369

 Other PWID

3

0.70

0.71

279

3.43 (0.84)

3.40 (0.86)

3.47 (0.82)

t(277) = − 0.687, p = 0.246

Stereotypes and prejudice

6

0.64

0.66

277

2.68 (0.56)

2.67 (0.56)

2.70 (0.57)

t(275) = − 0.395, p = 0.693

Internalized (n = 57)*

6

0.88

0.89

57

2.78 (0.88)

2.62 (0.85)

3.15 (0.86)

t(55) = − 2.188, p = 0.033

  1. Mean stigma scores can be interpreted as 1 = very low stigma, 2 = low to moderate stigma, 3 = moderate stigma, 4 = moderate to high stigma, 5 = very high stigma
  2. Statistically significant differences are in bold
  3. *Internalized stigma items were only asked of PWID who reported being diagnosed with HIV at baseline. Internalized HIV stigma items are not included in the total 18-item HIV stigma score