Skip to main content

Table 1 Selected characteristics of PWID assessed for willingness (no vs. yes) to use SIFs (n = 244)

From: Acceptability of supervised injection facilities among persons who inject drugs in upstate New York

Variable

No

Yes

p-value

n = 52

(%)

n = 192

(%)

Gender

 Male

27

(18.8)

117

(81.3)

0.42

 Female

25

(25.3)

74

(74.8)

 

 Non-binary

0

(0)

1

(100.0)

 

Education

 Less than high school

10

(17.5)

47

(82.5)

0.43

 At least high school/GED

42

(22.5)

145

(77.5)

 

Currently homeless

 No

46

(25.4)

135

(74.6)

0.004

 Yes

5

(8.2)

56

(91.8)

 

Drugs injected at least once in past 30 days

 No

28

(26.4)

78

(73.6)

0.09

 Yes

23

(17.3)

110

(82.7)

 

Injections per day

 1–2

22

(27.2)

59

(72.8)

0.07

 3–4

20

(22.5)

69

(77.5)

 

 > 5

8

(11.9)

59

(88.1)

 

Primary injecting location

 Private

42

(21.7)

152

(78.4)

0.66

 Public

9

(18.8)

39

(81.3)

 

Ever overdose

 No

28

(21.7)

101

(78.3)

0.93

 Yes

24

(21.2)

89

(78.8)

 

Visited SEP (past 12 mo)

 No

26

(22.8)

88

(77.2)

0.78

 Yes

21

(21.2)

78

(78.8)

 

Ever used narcan

 No

34

(21.8)

122

(78.2)

0.62

 Yes

15

(19.0)

64

(81.0)

 

Interaction with police (past 12 mo)

 No

38

(25.5)

111

(74.5)

0.04

 Yes

13

(14.3)

78

(85.7)

 

Ever arrested or incarcerated (past 12 mo)

 No

16

(26.2)

45

(73.8)

0.26

 Yes

35

(19.4)

145

(80.6)

 

Given less attention than other patients in a healthcare setting

 No

47

(23.9)

150

(76.1)

0.05

 Yes

5

(10.6)

42

(89.4)

 

Treated with hostility by a healthcare provider

 No

44

(22.8)

149

(77.2)

0.27

 Yes

8

(15.7)

43

(84.3)

 

Refused service by a healthcare provider

 No

52

(22.9)

175

(77.1)

0.03

 Yes

0

(0)

17

(100)

 
  1. Excludes those who were unsure about their acceptance of SIFs