Table 3 Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability outcomes
OPS clients participating in study (n = 599) | |
Allowed for physical distancing | 544 (92.4) |
Easy to use | 483 (80.6) |
Would use again | 557 (93) |
Improved comfort in being monitored and responded to | 503 (84) |
Satisfaction (Least = 1, Most = 5) | |
1 | 3 (0.5) |
2 | 7 (1.3) |
3 | 23 (4.1) |
4 | 142 (25.6) |
5 | 380 (68.5) |
OPS staff (n = 19) | |
Allowed for physical distancing | 16 (84.2) |
Easy to use | 17 (89.5) |
Would use again | 16 (84.2) |
Improved comfort in monitoring and responding to participating OPS clients | 16 (84.2) |
Satisfaction (Least = 1, Most = 5) | |
1 | 0 (0%) |
2 | 0 (0%) |
3 | 2 (10.5) |
4 | 8 (42.1) |
5 | 9 (47.4) |
Peer researchers (n = 599) | |
Satisfaction (Least = 1, Most = 5) | |
1 | 4 (0.8) |
2 | 7 (1.4) |
3 | 20 (4.1) |
4 | 95 (19.5) |
5 | 362 (74.2) |